Asia Insurance Post
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Data
  • Facts
  • Editorial
  • Interviews
Select Page

Comment on woman’s body structure is sexual harassment: Kerala High Court

by AIP Online Bureau | Jan 8, 2025 | Data, Policy, Workplace/Employee Benefits | 0 comments

The ruling by Justice A. Badharudeen came while dismissing a former Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) employee’s plea to quash the sexual harassment case against him filed by a woman staffer of the same organisation

The Kerala High Court has held that a comment on a woman’s “body structure” is a sexually coloured remark, which would constitute the penal offence of sexual harassment.

The ruling by Justice A. Badharudeen came while dismissing a former Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) employee’s plea to quash the sexual harassment case against him filed by a woman staffer of the same organisation.

The woman had alleged that the accused used vulgar language against her from 2013 onwards and then in 2016–17 began sending objectionable messages and voice calls.

Despite complaints against him to the KSEB and the police, he continued sending her objectionable messages, she had claimed.

Following her complaints, the accused was booked for the offences under sections 354A (sexual harassment) and 509 (insulting the modesty of a woman) of the IPC and section 120(o) (causing nuisance through any means of communication by undesirable call, letter, writing, message) of the Kerala Police Act.

Seeking to quash the case, the accused claimed that mere reference that a person has a nice body structure could not be attributed to sexually coloured remarks within the ambit of section 354A and 509 of the IPC and section 120(o) of the Kerala Police Act.

The prosecution and the woman, on the other hand, contended that the calls and messages of the accused carried sexually coloured remarks intended to harass her and outrage her modesty.

Agreeing with the prosecution’s contentions, the Kerala High Court court said that prima facie, the ingredients to attract the offences under sections 354A and 509 of IPC and section 120 (o) of the Kerala Police Act “are made out”.

“Having noticed the facts of the case, it is discernible that the prosecution case is specifically made out, prima facie, to attract the offences alleged to be committed. In the result, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case stands dismissed. Interim order, already granted, shall stand vacated,” the court said in its January 6 order.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Generali announces Central Bank of India as its new joint venture partner in India
  • T’gana pharma plant explosion: Sigachi says unit fully insured, assures support to affected persons
  • LIC CEO Bhanoo asks III to take insurance education to cities and schools
  • Gulf shipping costs drop as Israel-Iran ceasefire holds
  • PwC’s AI chief says firm has cut prices as tech saves staff time

Categories

  • Articles
  • Banking & Bancassurance
  • Blog
  • Breaking News!
  • Briefs
  • Climate, Environment, Renewable Energy
  • Data
  • Disaster & Management
  • Eco/Invest/Demography
  • Editorial
  • Events
  • Facts
  • Features
  • Health
  • Indian News
  • Intermediaries
  • International News
  • Interviews
  • Life
  • Main Menu
  • Non-Life
  • Pandemic
  • Pension & Social Security
  • Policy
  • Regulation
  • Reinsurance
  • Risk Management
  • Simple
  • Technology
  • Trends, Facts
  • Uncategorized
  • Wealth Management/ Philanthropy
  • Workplace/Employee Benefits
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Data
  • Facts
  • Editorial
  • Interviews
  • Eco/Invest/Demography
  • Indian News
  • International News
  • Health
  • Non-Life
  • Pandemic
  • Technology
  • Risk Management
  • Reinsurance
  • Banking & Bancassurance
  • Wealth Management/ Philanthropy