Asia Insurance Post
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Data
  • Facts
  • Editorial
  • Interviews
Select Page

Legal heirs can claim reimbursement if govt employee dies during treatment: Allahabad HC

by AIP Online Bureau | Mar 28, 2026 | Health, Indian News, Policy | 0 comments

The court rejected this argument of the state government, stating that the provisions of Rule 16 of the Rules, 2011, were arbitrary and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The court held that if a beneficiary dies or becomes incapable of making a claim, his or her legal heirs cannot be deprived of this right.

Lucknow: The Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court on Saturday said that if a government employee or pensioner dies during treatment or becomes incapable of making a claim, his legal heirs can also claim reimbursement of medical expenses.

The bench of Justice Alok Mathur and Justice Amitabh Kumar Rai passed the verdict on the petition of Chandra Choor Singh.

The petitioner’s father was a retired deputy registrar. He was treated at private hospitals in Lucknow, where he passed away during treatment. The petitioner applied for reimbursement of medical expenses, but the department rejected the claim, stating that only the “beneficiary” can make a claim under the rules.

The state government argued that under the Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Rules, 2011, a claim can only be made by a beneficiary, and the petitioner did not fall within this category. It also cited the limit of ₹5,000 set out in the succession certificate submitted by the petitioner.

The court rejected this argument of the state government, stating that the provisions of Rule 16 of the Rules, 2011, were arbitrary and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The court held that if a beneficiary dies or becomes incapable of making a claim, his or her legal heirs cannot be deprived of this right.

Applying the principle of “reading down”, the Court directed that Rule 16 be interpreted to include legal heirs, especially when there is no other eligible beneficiary.

The court also clarified that if there is no dispute about being an heir, it is not appropriate to reject the claim merely on technical grounds.

Ultimately, the court directed the concerned authority to reconsider the petitioner’s claim and take a decision within two months, and if the claim is found to be correct, payment should be ensured within one month.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Binance’s $6.3 Billion Hack: How Crypto insurance works
  • Create a culture of addressing policyholder grievances proactively, Seth urges insurers
  • Nat Cat claims pull GIC Re’s net profit down 14% to Rs 2456 cr in Q2FY27, Prm rises 17% to Rs 11,228 crore
  • New India focuses on underwriting, technology for profitable growth: CMD
  • Govt sets up high-level banking reform panel headed by former CVC Suresh N Patel

Categories

  • Articles
  • Banking & Bancassurance
  • Blog
  • Breaking News!
  • Briefs
  • Climate, Environment, Renewable Energy
  • Data
  • Disaster & Management
  • Eco/Invest/Demography
  • Editorial
  • Events
  • Facts
  • Features
  • Health
  • Indian News
  • Intermediaries
  • International News
  • Interviews
  • Life
  • Main Menu
  • Non-Life
  • Pandemic
  • Pension & Social Security
  • Policy
  • Regulation
  • Reinsurance
  • Risk Management
  • Simple
  • Technology
  • Trends, Facts
  • Uncategorized
  • Wealth Management/ Philanthropy
  • Workplace/Employee Benefits
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Data
  • Facts
  • Editorial
  • Interviews
  • Eco/Invest/Demography
  • Indian News
  • International News
  • Health
  • Non-Life
  • Pandemic
  • Technology
  • Risk Management
  • Reinsurance
  • Banking & Bancassurance
  • Wealth Management/ Philanthropy