Asia Insurance Post
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Data
  • Facts
  • Editorial
  • Interviews
Select Page

‘No work-no pay’ not for employees reinstated after full exoneration: HC

by AIP Online Bureau | Jul 20, 2024 | Indian News, Policy, Workplace/Employee Benefits | 0 comments

“It is apparent that on his reinstatement after the order of dismissal or removal is set aside, a government servant cannot be denied his entire pay and allowances for the period he was out of service,” the court said on Tuesday, allowing the petition

PRAYAGRAJ: The Allahabad High Court has held that the ‘no work-no pay’ formula is not applicable on those Uttar Pradesh government employees who have been reinstated after full exoneration.

Allowing a writ petition filed by one Dinesh Prasad, Justice Salil Kumar Rai held that the rule 54 of the Financial Hand Book Volume-II (Part II to IV) provides that a dismissed employee who has been fully exonerated from all charges in enquiry is entitled to full pay for the period of dismissal once he is reinstated.

The Allahabad High Court has held that the ‘no work-no pay’ formula is not applicable on those Uttar Pradesh government employees who have been reinstated after full exoneration.

Allowing a writ petition filed by one Dinesh Prasad, Justice Salil Kumar Rai held that the rule 54 of the Financial Hand Book Volume-II (Part II to IV) provides that a dismissed employee who has been fully exonerated from all charges in enquiry is entitled to full pay for the period of dismissal once he is reinstated.

It further provides that such period of dismissal shall be treated as period on duty in service.

“It is apparent that on his reinstatement after the order of dismissal or removal is set aside, a government servant cannot be denied his entire pay and allowances for the period he was out of service,” the court said on Tuesday, allowing the petition.

The court held that the quantum of amount which is payable to such employee will depend upon the nature of exoneration from the charges.

It was held that the only situation in which the pay to such employee can be denied is if he was in an employment for the period he was out of service, and was earning more or equivalent to the amount he is entitled to.

The petitioner was with the Uttar Pradesh Police. Disciplinary proceedings were instituted against the petitioner under Rule 14 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 1991 where charge-sheet was issued against him alleging unauthorized leave of two days, hunger strike affecting the reputation of police force.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • PB Fintech’s net profit increases 42% Rs to 85 crore, revenue up 33 % to Rs 1,348 cr in Q1 FY26
  • Aon promotes Rupert Moore as CEO, Reinsurance, Asia Pacific
  • Tsunami warnings fading after one of the largest earthquakes ever recorded
  • South Africa’s state-owned insurer sets up $1.1 billion riot buffer, to safeguard anticipated future unrest
  • Women-only US dating advice app Tea suspends messaging following breaches

Categories

  • Articles
  • Banking & Bancassurance
  • Blog
  • Breaking News!
  • Briefs
  • Climate, Environment, Renewable Energy
  • Data
  • Disaster & Management
  • Eco/Invest/Demography
  • Editorial
  • Events
  • Facts
  • Features
  • Health
  • Indian News
  • Intermediaries
  • International News
  • Interviews
  • Life
  • Main Menu
  • Non-Life
  • Pandemic
  • Pension & Social Security
  • Policy
  • Regulation
  • Reinsurance
  • Risk Management
  • Simple
  • Technology
  • Trends, Facts
  • Uncategorized
  • Wealth Management/ Philanthropy
  • Workplace/Employee Benefits
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Data
  • Facts
  • Editorial
  • Interviews
  • Eco/Invest/Demography
  • Indian News
  • International News
  • Health
  • Non-Life
  • Pandemic
  • Technology
  • Risk Management
  • Reinsurance
  • Banking & Bancassurance
  • Wealth Management/ Philanthropy