Asia Insurance Post
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Data
  • Facts
  • Editorial
  • Interviews
Select Page

Environmental Concerns:SC refuses to pass any order related to Adani group’s proposed thermal power plant in UP

by AIP Online Bureau | Feb 12, 2026 | Climate, Environment, Renewable Energy, Eco/Invest/Demography, Indian News, Policy, Risk Management | 0 comments

CJI Kant said the difficulty is that sometimes concerns are raised for power plants, sometimes for forests and sometimes for rivers, but developmental projects cannot be stalled like this.

The bench emphasised the need for robust enforcement machinery and scientific evaluation while questioning. It told Sanjay Parikh, appearing for an environmental activist, “We are not doubting what you are saying. But can it be permitted with proper safeguards?”

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to pass any direction against the Adani Group’s proposed thermal power plant in Uttar Pradesh and asked the state and the Central government to file their responses in the matter.

A bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi said it is not going to pass any order without looking at the replies of the state government and the Centre.

“The state may be power-deficient. We can’t pass orders like this. We need to strike a balance between environmental concerns and development,” the bench told senior advocate Sanjay Parikh, appearing for an environmental activist.

Parikh submitted that the plant is surrounded by forests and may endanger sloth bears and other wild animals. He said the Adani Group got the environmental clearance despite the pendency of the petition before the apex court and the National Green Tribunal.

“They are building a huge power plant over there, and (it) may affect the environment and the wildlife,” the counsel submitted.

CJI Kant said the difficulty is that sometimes concerns are raised for power plants, sometimes for forests and sometimes for rivers, but developmental projects cannot be stalled like this. The bench emphasised the need for robust enforcement machinery and scientific evaluation while questioning. It told Parikh, “We are not doubting what you are saying. But can it be permitted with proper safeguards?”

CJI Kant asked Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhatti, appearing for the Centre, to file their response, indicating how they plan to balance the ecological concerns and what is the way out. It also allowed the Uttar Pradesh government and the Adani Group to file their responses in the matter.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Two days of stock market slump wipes out Rs 18.60 lakh cr from investors’ wealth
  • Indian re/insurers to impement Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) from April 1, can avail forbearance for 1-yr:IRDAI
  • The April 1 Renewals: Soft Market with Hard OptionsCapacity, Conflict and Competitive Discipline
  • Life Insurance:Support for Indian households across stages
  • India’s Population Dilemma:South states want more kids

Categories

  • Articles
  • Banking & Bancassurance
  • Blog
  • Breaking News!
  • Briefs
  • Climate, Environment, Renewable Energy
  • Data
  • Disaster & Management
  • Eco/Invest/Demography
  • Editorial
  • Events
  • Facts
  • Features
  • Health
  • Indian News
  • Intermediaries
  • International News
  • Interviews
  • Life
  • Main Menu
  • Non-Life
  • Pandemic
  • Pension & Social Security
  • Policy
  • Regulation
  • Reinsurance
  • Risk Management
  • Simple
  • Technology
  • Trends, Facts
  • Uncategorized
  • Wealth Management/ Philanthropy
  • Workplace/Employee Benefits
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Data
  • Facts
  • Editorial
  • Interviews
  • Eco/Invest/Demography
  • Indian News
  • International News
  • Health
  • Non-Life
  • Pandemic
  • Technology
  • Risk Management
  • Reinsurance
  • Banking & Bancassurance
  • Wealth Management/ Philanthropy