Asia Insurance Post
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Data
  • Facts
  • Editorial
  • Interviews
Select Page

Maharashtra: Tribunal awards Rs 74 lakh compensation to family of accident victim

by AIP Online Bureau | Nov 16, 2025 | Indian News, Non-Life | 0 comments

The New India Assurance Company contested the claim, arguing that the deceased was partly negligent and that the truck driver lacked a valid licence and vehicle fitness documents. However, the tribunal rejected these claims, noting that the insurer failed to provide any proof or lead evidence supporting its allegations.

Thane: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Thane, has awarded a compensation of Rs 74,03,910 to the family of a 46-year-old Bhayandar resident who died in a road accident in 2020. The order was passed by Tribunal Member R.V. Mohite on Friday.

The petition was filed by the victim’s widow, Sushma Chauhan, and their two children after Vinodkumar Bhagirath Chauhan, an export incharge with Devu Tools Pvt. Ltd., was fatally injured on June 2, 2020, when a truck rammed into his motorcycle near Vijay Nagar Junction on Marol–Maroshi Road.

Truck Rammed Motorcycle While Attempting to Overtake

According to the FIR and witness statements, Vinodkumar and a friend were riding home when a speeding truck attempted to overtake their motorcycle, hitting it from behind. The impact caused the motorcycle to topple, and the truck’s rear wheel ran over Vinodkumar, killing him on the spot.

Truck Driver Booked Under IPC Sections 279 and 304(A)

The truck driver was later booked under sections 279 and 304(A) of the IPC by MIDC police. The tribunal held that the truck driver was solely responsible for the crash, noting that he failed to maintain a safe distance and was driving rashly.

Insurer’s Objections Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence

The New India Assurance Company contested the claim, arguing that the deceased was partly negligent and that the truck driver lacked a valid licence and vehicle fitness documents. However, the tribunal rejected these claims, noting that the insurer failed to provide any proof or lead evidence supporting its allegations.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • French and Spanish firefighters battle wildfires for a sixth consecutive day
  • Assam flood: Over 4.4 lakh people affected in 6 districts, toll remains at 68
  • Crypto asset tax reporting obligation: Here is what it means for exchanges, investors
  • Emerging markets stare at inflation risks as powerful El Niño looms
  • Record-low Danube levels expose shipwrecks

Categories

  • Articles
  • Banking & Bancassurance
  • Blog
  • Breaking News!
  • Briefs
  • Climate, Environment, Renewable Energy
  • Data
  • Disaster & Management
  • Eco/Invest/Demography
  • Editorial
  • Events
  • Facts
  • Features
  • Health
  • Indian News
  • Intermediaries
  • International News
  • Interviews
  • Life
  • Main Menu
  • Non-Life
  • Pandemic
  • Pension & Social Security
  • Policy
  • Regulation
  • Reinsurance
  • Risk Management
  • Simple
  • Technology
  • Trends, Facts
  • Uncategorized
  • Wealth Management/ Philanthropy
  • Workplace/Employee Benefits
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Data
  • Facts
  • Editorial
  • Interviews
  • Eco/Invest/Demography
  • Indian News
  • International News
  • Health
  • Non-Life
  • Pandemic
  • Technology
  • Risk Management
  • Reinsurance
  • Banking & Bancassurance
  • Wealth Management/ Philanthropy