The judgment authored by Justice J.B. Pardiwala suggested that the Parliament should seriously consider substituting the term “child pornography” with “child sexual exploitative and abuse material” (CSEAM) and in the meantime, the Union government may bring an ordinance to amend the POCSO
New Delhi: The Supreme Court of New Delhi ruled on Monday that the retention of child pornography material on any personal device, or the failure to delete such content, would be considered an offense under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.
The decision was delivered by a bench consisting of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice JB Pardiwala, which overturned a recent judgment by the Madras High Court.
The Madras High Court had earlier ruled that the act of downloading or viewing child pornography, in the absence of an intention to distribute or transmit, did not constitute an offense.
However, the Supreme Court decisively overturned this interpretation, asserting that the mere possession of such material is indeed a criminal offense under the POCSO Act, which is designed to safeguard children from sexual exploitation and abuse.
The bench established specific guidelines regarding child pornography and its associated legal ramifications. The Supreme Court had earlier agreed to review the petition contesting the Madras High Court’s decision, which stated that merely downloading and viewing child pornography did not constitute an offense under the POCSO Act and the Information Technology (IT) Act.
The judgment suggested that the Parliament should seriously consider substituting the term “child pornography” with “child sexual exploitative and abuse material” (CSEAM) and in the meantime, the Union government may bring an ordinance to amend the POCSO.
Further, the top court asked all the courts across the country to not use the term “child pornography” in any judicial order or judgment, and instead endorse the term “child sexual exploitative and abuse material (CSEAM).”
In its judgment, the Supreme Court said that offence under Section 15 of the POCSO is in the nature and form of an inchoate offence which penalises the mere storage or possession of any pornographic material involving a child when done with a specific intent prescribed thereunder, without requiring any actual transmission, dissemination etc.
The CJI D.Y. Chandrachud-led Bench, in March this year, issued a notice on the plea challenging the Madras High Court order which had held that downloading and possessing child pornography does not amount to any offence.
The Madras High Court in its impugned judgment had quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against a 28-year-old Chennai man, holding that watching child pornography in private would not fall within the scope of the POCSO Act.
A Bench of Justice N. Anand Venkatesh reasoned that the accused had merely downloaded the material and watched the pornography in private and it was neither published nor transmitted to others.
“Since he has not used a child or children for pornographic purposes, at best, it can only be construed as a moral decay on the part of the accused person,” it said.
The Chennai police registered an FIR under Sections 67 B of the Information Technology Act and Section 14(1) of the POCSO Act after it seized the phone of the accused and discovered that he had downloaded and possessed child pornography.
IANS